Iinuma,
M., Matsuhashi, T., Nakamura, T. & Chiyokura, H. (2014). Collaborative learning
using integrated groupware: A case study in a higher education setting. International Journal of Information and
Education Technology, 4(4), 351-355. DOI: 10.7763/IJIET.2014.V4.42
Collaboration is
considered an essential ‘21st Century’ learning skill amongst
Critical thinking, Creativity and Information Literacy from a Japanese higher
education perspective. As a means to promote class interaction and group work, the
study supports an integrated Information, Communications and Technology (ICT) Groupware
system in a higher education setting whereby enrolled students participate in a
course.
The authors detail
collaboration as a construction of shared knowledge through activities with
others, where the participants are committed to or engaged in shared goals and
problem solving [7]. As such a constructivist learning theory which bases its
philosophy on the idea that knowledge is constructed by the learner through
activity [8]. According to this theory, collaboration fosters deep learning by
exposing students to different perspectives and allowing opportunity for
negotiation to occur [9], [10].
The purpose of this
study is to conduct collaborative learning using Groupware for college students
and to evaluate its usage. The method of implementation is on a purpose built
platform to gauge individual profiling, classroom interaction and group
activities. The content is scheduled over 9 sessions of 90 minutes in duration
which includes 16 classes with approximately 30 students per class. The
objectives stated are to enhance global awareness, learn the current social
issues and to design solutions to problems identified utilising the collaborative
process. Group evaluation standards include 6 group assignments and 3
individual assignments.
The group assignments
covered group posters, power point slides and presentations with the resource
distribution of one desk to four computers in a computer lab per class session.
The Groupware application is Microsoft Sharepoint 2013 as it is supported by
‘cloud’ computing accompanied with a web-server platform for formal
accessibility to 480 students. For example the ability of multiple users to
simultaneously create and co-edit documents in the ‘cloud’ without the
necessity to download documents to local computers was the point of group
collaboration. The student activities
could then be evaluated with pre-designed worksheets which noted student
interaction for creating files and editing duties.
For instance, the
co-editing feature in Groupware enabled the instructor to request students
co-write in one Excel file. The student responses were then shared to the class
with a projector and the benefit to both students and the instructor was the
simultaneous nature of the exchange and the ability of the instructor to
promote a discussion forum. For example a result showed that students answered
most positively to Q15 “I learned something new in class” with average score of
1.99. As such for Questions 1 to 19, showed that that overall, students answered
positively to most questions. The resulting comments of Question 20 for
students who responded was 10 students commented positively; nine students
commented on experiencing technical difficulty with the Powerpoint group
worksheet and their inability to co-edit the files and seven students experienced
technical difficulty with the groupware login process.
In summary a proposed
solution is ‘adequate scaffolding’ to enhance the collaborative process
successfully and to produce high quality output through the guidance of
instructors. An alternate solution to the technological problem of appropriate
usage of the Groupware interface is to provide adequate guideline sets for
students to use as they collaborate with instructor and peers during their
assessment of each others’ output. For example a proposed use of highly
designed groupware and a common college seminar could be transformed into a
highly interactive and collaborative environment. It is recommended that further
research is needed to implement effective scaffolding solution(s) both human
and technological in nature, in appropriate contexts and as a provision to all
students.
References
[7]
Hamalainen, R. and Arvaja, M. (2009). Scripted Collaboration and Group-Based
Variations in a Higher Education CSCL Context. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1-16.
[8]
Martens, R., Bastiaen, T. & Kirschner,
P. A. (2007). New Learning Design in Distance Education: The impact on
student perception and motivation. Distance
Education, 28(1), 81-93.
[9]
Huang, J. J. S., Yang, S. J. H., Huang, Y.-M. & Hsiao, I. Y. T. (2010).
Social learning networks: build mobile learning networks based on collaborative
services. Educational Technology &
Society, 13(3), 78-92.
[10]
Vygotsky, L. S. (1974). Mind in society:
The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Trans.).
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
I find the study very useful in terms of actual ‘action’ research where authentic activities and plausible solutions could benefit a student’s academic journey. I like collaboration and the constructivist approach to student-centred learning.
ReplyDelete